Blog

Arbitration vs. U.S. Litigation: Choosing the Best Path for Your Supply Chain Dispute

When drafting supply chain contracts, the choice between arbitration and litigation is a strategic decision that can shape the trajectory of future disputes. Corporate counsel must weigh efficiency, enforceability, cost, and confidentiality against the complexity and stakes of potential claims. Whether advising on cross-border transactions, long-term vendor relationships, or high-value procurement deals, the dispute resolution clause deserves more than boilerplate treatment.

In this post, we’ll break down common triggers for supplier disputes, key differences between arbitration vs litigation in supply chain conflicts, and strategic tips for drafting arbitration clauses that protect your client’s interests.

Common Triggers for Supplier Disputes

Supply chain disputes often arise from:

  • Late deliveries or missed deadlines
  • Quality control failures
  • Scope creep
  • Pricing disputes and payment delays
  • Intellectual property, trademark, and trade secret issues
  • Competition and exclusivity conflicts

These issues can escalate quickly, especially when operational timelines or brand reputation are at stake.

Arbitration vs. Litigation: Key Differences

When Arbitration Makes More Sense

When navigating supply chain disputes, it's essential to understand the common triggers leading to conflicts between suppliers and distributors. Below are key factors that often tip the scale on the side of arbitration:

  • You want a faster and final resolution to avoid operational delays
  • You need confidentiality of proceedings
  • You prefer an arbitrator with industry-specific experience
  • You want to avoid the unpredictability of jury trials
  • The convenient venue, language of proceedings, and ability to choose an arbitrator are important to you

When Litigation Might Be the Better Path

These are potential factors in choosing the litigation path:

  • You need a broader discovery to uncover hidden evidence
  • You want the option to appeal a bad decision
  • You may need injunctive relief or emergency court orders, which are unavailable in arbitration
  • You may have better results with a jury trial
  • You may find that a judgment is easier to enforce in the jurisdiction than an arbitration award

Strategic Tips for Supply Chain Arbitration Clauses

To ensure arbitration works in your favor, consider these drafting strategies:

  • Specify the arbitration rules and venue. In choosing the rules and venue, make sure you know what those rules offer and whether you know an experienced counsel specializing in international arbitrations.
  • Specify the governing law. Confirm that your choice-of-law clause is enforceable and aligns with your client’s jurisdictional advantages.
  • Consider including an attorney fee provision. Check its enforceability under the chosen law to avoid surprises.
  • Preserve access to emergency remedies. Make emergency and provisional remedies available through the court when they are not available in arbitration.
  • Build in escalation steps. Consider requiring mediation before arbitration to preserve relationships and reduce costs.
  • Review enforceability across jurisdictions. This is especially important for international supply chains and cross-border contracts.

How IB Law Firm Helps You Decide

At IB Law Firm, we support corporate counsel with:

  • Conduct audits to assess dispute resolution readiness and strategy
  • Comparative law analysis of remedies and enforceability
  • Risk analysis of supply chain practices
  • Representation in arbitration and litigation
  • Strategic advice on preserving vendor relationships while protecting your bottom line

Not sure whether to include the arbitration provision in the contract?

Let our team advise on the fastest, most cost-effective route to the resolution of potential disputes. Contact us here to get started.
EN Business Law Supply Chain Law